Trial of bestiality and poisoning.
Ruvinsky, a manager of after hours clubs in Toronto, allegedly allowed his dogs to lick and sniff cocaine. A former sex worker, “Crazy Jennie” Rowden notified the police that Ruvinsky had sexual intercourse with his Doberman. The Toronto Humane Society, in conjunction with the police, seized the dogs without a warrant. The THS was determined to have acted in good faith, despite the lack of a warrant, and its actions were justified by the urgency and severity of the allegations.
A witness reported that the accused digitally penetrated the anus of his male dog, and let one of his dogs lick his genitals. She also reported that both of the accused’s dogs were permitted to lick and sniff cocaine, which was present in the accused’s living room. The dogs were taken into custody by animal control authorities, and their fur and urine was subsequently tested for the presence of cocaine. The tests showed trace elements of cocaine in the dogs’ urine and fur. The accused argued that the seizure of the dogs, and the testing of the fur and urine, was done without a warrant and without his consent.
Held: The accused was acquitted. Bestiality included anal or vaginal intercourse with an animal by a man or a woman. This definition did not include digital penetration of the dog, or a dog’s licking a human’s genitals. The seizure of the dogs for their safe keeping was not a breach of the accused’s rights under section 8 of the Charter. The taking of the dogs’ fur and urine samples constituted a minor violation of the accused’s Charter rights. However, the real evidence obtained was non-conscriptive, and its admission did not render the trial unfair. Accordingly, the dogs’ hair and urine was admitted into evidence. However, given the problems with continuity of this evidence, the samples were given little weight. The Crown did not introduce any evidence that cocaine was a harmful drug to animals.